Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper argues that Constructivism as the approach in International Relations are still debated. The debate is on Conventional (modern) and Critical (post-modern) constructivsm. Although both are claimed as critical approach (similar in their epistemological aspect) and emerged in the same context and same culture of school in IR, they are different in adopting the methodological aspect. It may caused by the constructivist itself grow along the growing of critical studies and the legacy of IR’s behavoralism which still remains dominantly. Thus, it makes one constructivist hold on to reflectivism too much and another constructivist engaged to positivism in order to prove that constructivism is scientific enough theoretically. Outlining the historical background both context and academic text, this paper analyze this issue in a path.
Keywords
Article Details
References
- Burchell, G., & al, e. (1991). The Foucault Effect: The Studies in Governmentality. US: The University of Chicago Press.
- Burchill, S. (2005). Constructivism: in Theories of International Relations, 3rd (ed). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth ofthe Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception . London and New York: Routledge.
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: Tge Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
- Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Order Writings 1972-19777. New York: Phanteon Books.
- Fowler, M. C. (2005). Amateur soldiers, global wars : insurgency and modern conflict. US: Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: The Free Press.
- Griffiths, M. (2007). International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction. US & Canada: Routledge.
- Guzzini, S., & Leander, A. (2006). Constructivism and International Relations Alexander Wendt and his critics. London and New York: Routledge.
- Hadiwinata, B. S. (2017). Studi dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: ARUS Utama, Alternatif, dan Reflektivis. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
- Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, ol. 23, No. 1, pp. 171-200 p. 183. DOI:10.1162/isec.23.1.171
- Hough, P. (2015). International Security Studies, Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
- Lawson, S. (2015). Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics. UK and USA: Polity Press.
- Mudhoffir, A. M. (2013). Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan Bagi Sosiologi Politik. Jurnal Sosiologi Masyarakat, Vol. 18 No.1 , 75 – 100.
- Reus-Smit, C. (2002). Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol.4, Issue 3, 487 - 509. DOI:10.1111/1467-856X.00091
- Richard Price, C. R.-S. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 259-294. DOI:10.1177/1354066198004003001
- Romaniuk, S. N. (2016). Insurgency And Counterinsurgencyin Modern War. Parkway NW: CRC Press.
- Sikkink, M. F. (2001). Taking stock: Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 4, 391-416. DOI:10.1146/ANNUREV.POLISCI.4.1.391
- Stefano Guzzini, A. L. (2006). Constructivism and International Relations Alexander Wendt and his critics. London and New York: Routledge.
- Tim Dunne, e. a. (2010). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Ofxord: Oxford University Press.
- Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183