Main Article Content


In general, all aspects and assessment criteria were met. However, it would be better if the supervision was carried out periodically by the school. However, several aspects and criteria have not been achieved, such as a detailed standard review, several general administration learning targets that have not been achieved, and three characteristics of education quality that have not been met. For this reason, the school must continue to evaluate so that later general administration learning is carried out more effectively and beneficially for the parties concerned. This research is a qualitative research. In this study, the author uses a case study as an investigative method. Furthermore, the research design model used is the discrepancy evaluation (DEM) model. Data collection techniques used: interviews with the school (principals, and teachers), students and parents, document study, and observation. In this study, the researcher used Miles and Huberman model data analysis, namely data analysis carried out at the time of data collection and after data collection was completed in a certain period. Activities in the data analysis model are data reduction, data display, and drawing conclusions/verification. The results of this study will have a positive and significant impact on the general administration learning program at this school if the parties optimize as much as possible in minimizing existing gaps and obstacles so that the positive impact of online learning that is carried out is more effective and widespread. Apart from that, future research can continue to explore the alignment between the national learning regulations of general administration and school regulations, as well as the readiness of school information technology facilities in implementing maximum learning.


evaluation, assessment, general administrative courses

Article Details


  1. Bdair, I.A. (2021). Perspektif mahasiswa keperawatan dan anggota fakultas tentang pembelajaran online selama pandemi COVID-19: Sebuah studi kualitatif. Belajar Mengajar dalam Keperawatan.
  2. Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2019). Sebuah tinjauan literatur: kemanjuran kursus pembelajaran online untuk institusi pendidikan tinggi menggunakan meta-analisis. Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, 26.
  3. Directorate General of GTK Kemendikbud. (2016). Technical guidelines for the online learning mode teacher improvement program.
  4. Dolan, E., Hancock, E., & Wareing, A. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran online untuk mengajarkan kompetensi praktis pada mahasiswa sarjana ilmu kesehatan. Internet dan Pendidikan Tinggi, 24, 21–25.
  5. Fletche, K.M. (2005). Self-efficacy sebagai ukuran evaluasi program dalam mendukung literasi pembelajaran online untuk mahasiswa sarjana. Internet dan Pendidikan Tinggi, 8(4), 307–322.
  6. Griff, E. R., & Materi, S. F. (2012). Evaluasi sistem pembelajaran online adaptif. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Inggris, 44(1), 170–176.
  7. Gunawan, I. (2011). Evaluasi program pembelajaran.
  8. Gündüz, A. Y., Alemda, E., Yaşar, S., & Erdem, M. (2016). Desain lingkungan belajar online berbasis masalah dan evaluasi efektivitasnya. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Online Turki, 15(3), 49–57.
  9. Hamid, R., Sentryo, I., & Hasan, S. (2020). Pembelajaran online dan permasalahannya di masa darurat Covid-19. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 86–95. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). Pengajaran Jarak Jauh dan Pembelajaran Online.
  10. Hosie, P., Schibeci, R., & Backhaus, A. (2005). Kerangka kerja dan daftar periksa untuk mengevaluasi pembelajaran online di pendidikan tinggi. Asesmen & Evaluasi di Perguruan Tinggi, 30(5).
  11. Kearns, L. (2012). Penilaian Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Online: Tantangan dan Praktik Efektif. Jolt.Merlot.Org, 8(3), 198–208. Diperoleh dari
  12. Novita, A., & Abdul, H. (2015). The use of online – offline learning media and interpersonal communication on English learning outcomes. Journal of Information & Communication Technology in Education, 2(1).
  13. Novita, M. (2017). Good facilities and infrastructure are the spearhead of the success of Islamic educational institutions.
  14. Oktaviyani, A., & Sukirlan, M. (2015). Evaluation of the English learning program in the English class for children at Smart Bandar Jaya. Page, T., Thorsteinsson, G., … Lehtonen, M. (2008). A Methodology For The Evaluation Of Online Learning Resources. I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 16–27.
  15. Pakpahan, R., & Fitriani, Y. (2020). Analysis of the use of information technology in distance learning in the midst of the COVID-19 virus pandemic.
  16. Pangondian, R. A., Santosa, P. I., & Nugroho, E. (2019). Factors that influence the success of online learning in the industrial revolution 4.0.
  17. Park, J.Y. (2011). Desain Pendidikan Online: Penyampaian dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Internasional Pendidikan Seni & Desain, 30(2), 176-187.
  18. Pusitaningtyas, A. (2017). The influence of parent and teacher communication on student creativity. Proceedings of the ICECRS.
  19. Minutes, A., Ibad, W., Maghfiroh, L., Azza, M. I., Cahyani, S. A., & Ulfayati, Z. A. (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on teaching and learning activities in MI/SD (online-based KBM studies for teachers and students). JIEES: Journal of Islamic Education at Elementary School, 1(1), 10–16. Retrieved from
  20. Setyawan, C. E. (2018). Arabic language learning program evaluation design. 9.
  21. Tomczyk, ., Potyrała, K., Włoch, A., Wnęk-Gozdek, J., & Demeshkant, N. (2020). Evaluasi fungsionalitas platform e-learning baru vs. Pengalaman sebelumnya dalam e-learning dan penilaian diri terhadap literasi digital sendiri. Keberlanjutan (Swiss), 12(23), 1-22.
  22. Tsa, F.-H., Tsa, C.-C., & Kuen-Yi Lin. (2015). Evaluasi mode permainan yang berbeda dan jenis umpan balik pada penilaian formatif berbasis permainan di lingkungan belajar online. Komputer & Pendidikan, 81, 259–269.
  23. Wicks, D., Craft, B. B., Lee, D. D., Lumpe, A., Henrikson, R., & Baliram, N. (2015). Evaluasi Kolaborasi Rendah Versus Tinggi dalam Pembelajaran Online. Pembelajaran Daring, 19(4).