Perception of EFL Students on the Use Grammarly Application in Writing Class
Abstract
As EFL students, we cannot separate from writing assignments and articles in English. For some students, it is not easy to express thoughts with good grammar directly. They often require several repetitions of works to avoid making mistakes. Even so, they still make a mistake in grammar. Grammatical errors in the writing class often make it difficult for lecturers to understand student writing content so that students get unsatisfactory feedback. One solution to this problem is implementing the Grammarly application in writing assignments and articles. This study aims to determine students' views on using the Grammarly application in writing assignments and articles. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis methods. The research subjects were students of the fifth semester of English Language Education, FKIP Tidar University. The research data used an automatic grammar checker in the learning process of writing namely Grammarly.
Downloads
References
Charrouf, A. (2015). Improving EFL Students’ Writing Skill through a Directed Blog Case of Students at Mohamed Khider University of Biskra A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for The Master of Arts Degree in Language Sciences.
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Collins, W. (2018). Writing defined. Retrieved from: http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/englis h/writing
Daniels, P., & Leslie, D. (2013). Grammar software ready for EFL writers? OnCue Journal, 9(4), 391–401.
Hariyanto. (2007). A Study on the Correlation between Grammar Mastery, Indirect Learning Strategies and Reading Ability of the Second Grade Students of SMK Batik 1 Surakarta. Skripsi. Surakarta:UNS
Novianti, Erynda (2020) EFL Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Grammarly in Writing Thesis. Skripsi, Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.
McAlexander, P. J. (2000). Checking the Grammar Checker: Intergrating Grammar Instruction with Writing. Journal of Basic Writing Vol. 19 No.2
Moleong,J.L (2010) Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Pujiawati, N. I. A. (2018). Mengintegrasikan Automatic Grammar Checker, 6, 1–11. http://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php /judika
Rakhmat, Jalaludin. (2007). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Richard, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robbin, S. P. (2002). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta : Prenhallindo.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior 15th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Spratt, Mary., Pulverness, A., Williams, Melanie. 2005. The Teaching Knowledge Test Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suramiharja, A., et al. (1996). Petunjuk Praktis Menulis. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Weigle, S.C. 2002. Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wichadee, S. (2013). Peer feedback on Facebook: The use of social networking websites to develop writing ability of undergraduate students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.25470.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ghaida Nurul Rahma Hakiki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development is licensed under a 