Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Cassiavera's contribution to the regional economy of Kerinci Regency is 5.58%,  6.35%  to the gross value added, and 21.23%  the contribution to regional exports. Cassiavera's lands are mostly controlled by "white-collar farmers" or in The local language is called ”land lord”. If there is an increase in the price of Cassiavera, then the "white-collar farmers" will benefit, not the cultivators or "black-collar farmers". “Black-collar farmers” are those who actually work on Cassiavera lands, only labor or wage farmers with a piece-work or daily system. The increase in Cassiavera prices does not directly increase the welfare of Cassiavera farmers.  This study aims to analyze and determine the factors that affect the income of Cassiavera farmers in Kerinci Regency.  The analytical method used is descriptive Crosstab method and multiple linear regression with Ordinary Least Square (OLS). The results of the Crosstab tabulation show that there is a relationship between Cassiavera's age, education, labor and land area with Cassivaera's farm income, while the number of stems has no relationship with Cassivaera's farm income. The results of this regression indicate that, partially Cassiavera age, labor and land area have a significant and significant effect on the income of Cassiavera farmers in Kerinci Regency, while the number of stems and education have no effect on the income of Cassiavera farmers. Simultaneously, all variables of Cassiavera age, number of stems, education, labor and land area have a significant effect on farmers' income.

Keywords

Cassiavera's age Income Land area Number of stems Workforce

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Bandara T, Uluwaduge I, Jansz ER. Bioactivity of cinnamon with special emphasis on diabetes mellitus: A review. Int J Food Sci Nutr. Taylor & Francis; 2012;63:380–6.
  2. BPS-Statistics of Kerinci Regency. Kabupaten Kerinci dalam angka. Kerinci; 2018.
  3. Alimah D. Studi pengusahaan kayu manis di hulu sungai selatan, Kalimantan Selatan. Galam. 2015;1:9–19.
  4. Erfit. Studi tentang kinerja sektor pertanian Provinsi Jambi tahun 2005-2009. J Paradig Ekon. 2014;9:25–32.
  5. Nurhayani, Rosmeli. Guncangan harga dan pangsa pasar ekspor kayu manis Kabupaten Kerinci. J Sains Sosio Hum. 2019;3:189–97.
  6. Dirgasová K, Bandlerová A, Lazíková J. Factors affecting the price of agricultural land in Slovakia. J Cent Eur Agric. Journal of Central European Agriculture; 2017;18:291–304.
  7. Soeharjo, Patong D. Sendi-sendi pokok ilmu usahatani. Bogor: Departemen Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi IPB; 1973.
  8. Soekartawi. Prinsip dasar ekonomi pertanian: teori dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 1993.
  9. Menggala SR, Damme P V. Improving Cinnamomum burmannii Blume value chains for farmer livelihood in Kerinci, Indonesia. Eur J Nat Sci Med. 2021;4:92–121.
  10. Effendy RS. Peranan pendidikan dan produktivitas sektor pertanian terhadap penurunan tingkat kemiskinan di Jawa Tengah. Media Ekon dan Manaj. 2017;32:108–18.
  11. Sugiyono. Metode penelitian bisnis, pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatiff, kombinasi, dan R&D. 3rd ed. Bandung: CV Alfabeta; 2018.
  12. Gujarati DN. Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
  13. Baguna FL, Kaddas F. Analisis rantai nilai dan kontribusi pendapatan terhadap pemanfaatan HHBK kayu manis di Pulau Tidore. J Inov Penelit. 2021;1:1787–94.
  14. Rismunandar, Paimin FB. Kayu manis: budidaya dan pengolahan. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya; 2009.
  15. Mawardati. Analisis pendapatan usahatani kelapa sawit perkebunan rakyat di Kabupaten Aceh Utara. J. AGRIFOR. 2016. p. 19–29.