Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The problem in this research is the durability of the chili harvested and the fluctuations in the price of chili that are not certain. This opportunity to improve the standard of living did not last long because many chilies from other regions flooded the surrounding markets and were more in demand by consumers because they were cheaper. This situation is very worrying because it impacts the decline in selling power so that there is a buildup of harvests and spoilage of chilies. The above problems must be the attention of all parties to find the best solution so that farmers can take advantage of opportunities. Efforts taken to extend the shelf life of chili are applying chili processing technology to food products, such as chili shreds. This research aims to assist farmers in increasing their income and getting solutions to their business problems audience for other researchers. Analysis of the data used in this study is the analysis of added value (Added Value). The Hayami method is carried out in two stages, the first stage is calculating output, input and price, and then the second stage is calculating revenue and advantage. In this study, the Hayami method was used, adapted to the modification, which was the basis of calculation using the value of money. The management of fresh cayenne pepper commodities to shredded cayenne pepper is feasible to run. The added value of shredded cayenne pepper products is Rp 145,000/kg with every Rp 1, the product’s value contains an added value of Rp 145. It proves that the use of fresh cayenne pepper into shredded cayenne pepper is a profitable business and can help reduce damage to easily damaged chilies. If not sold immediately.

Keywords

Diversification Hayami products Shredded chili

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. BPS Wajo Regency. Wajo Regency in figure. Badan Pus. Stat. Kabupaten Wajo. 2023.
  2. Hadi S, Wahyudi MI, Hazmi M, Prayuginingsih H. Assessment of value added and development opportunity of agroindustry activity based on marine resources in Sub District of Panarukan, District of Situbondo. E3S Web Conf. 2018;52:00046.
  3. Coltrain D, Barton D, Boland M. Value added: opportunities and strategies. Kansas City: Arthur Capper Cooperative Center, Department of Agricultural Economics. Kansas State University; 2000.
  4. Sikone HY, Hartono B, Suyadi, Utami HD, Nugroho BA. Value-added analysis of the meat agroindustry in Indonesia. Online J Anim Feed Res. 2022;12:266–71.
  5. Kesumawati N, Hayati R. Diversifikasi produk olahan cabai merah keriting sebagai alternatif penanganan pasca panen cabai merah di Kecamatan Curup Utara Kabupaten Rejang Lebong. Dharma Raflesia J Ilm Pengemb dan Penerapan IPTEKS. 2016;14:167–75.
  6. Padapi A, Mursalat A, Haryono I, Fitriyah N. Pengaruh e-commerce terhadap fluktuasi harga dan peningkatan pendapatan petani cabai rawit. J AGRISEP Kaji Masal Sos Ekon Pertan dan Agribisnis. 2021;20:129–40.
  7. Tarigans DD. Diversifikasi usahatani kelapa sebagai upaya untuk meningkatkan pendapatan petani. Perspektif. 2005;4:71–8.
  8. Hartuti S, Agustina R. Comparative analysis production of fruit and sunti acid using the Hayami method. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. Banda Aceh: IOP Publishing Ltd.; 2021. p. 012018.
  9. Nurhasanah N, Machfud, Mangunwidjaja D, Romli M. Value added of kenaf fibre in natural fibre agroindustry supply chain network. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. Bogor: IOP Publishing Ltd.; 2020. p. 012054.
  10. Nuzuliyah L. Analisis nilai tambah produk olahan tanaman rimpang. Ind J Teknol dan Manaj Agroindustri. 2018;7:31–8.
  11. Hasanah U, Masyhuri M, Djuwari D. Analisis nilai tambah agroindustri sale pisang di Kabupaten Kebumen. Ilmu Pertan. 2016;18:141.
  12. Wardhani RM, Wuryantoro, Adinurani PG. Value added analysis of yard-based agroindustry for food security. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. Manila: IOP Publishing Ltd.; 2019. p. 012028.
  13. Wulandari S, Alouw JC. Designing business models for rural agroindustry to increase the added value of coconut. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. IOP Publishing Ltd.; 2021. p. 022013.
  14. Wachdijono W, Julhan R. Analysis of added value in dry sea fish agroindustry in Gebang Sub District, Cirebon Regency. J Phys Conf Ser. Cirebon: IOP Publishing Ltd.; 2019. p. 012033.
  15. Born H. Keys to success in value-added agriculture. 2001;1–20.
  16. Agnes A, Antara M. Analisis pendapatan dan kelayakan usahatani cabai rawit di Desa Sunju Kecamatan Marawola Kabupaten Sigi. e-J Agrotekbis. 2017;5:86–91.
  17. Gloy BA, Akridge JT, Preckel P V. Customer Lifetime Value: An application in the rural petroleum market. Agribus An Int J. 1997;13:335–47.
  18. Marsigit W. Pengembangan diversifikasi produk pangan olahan lokal bengkulu untuk menunjang ketahanan pangan berkelanjutan. Agritech. 2010;30:256–64.
  19. Indriani R, Darma R, Musa Y, Tenriawaru AN, Imran S. Product flow pattern at cayyene pepper supply chain. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. Makassar: IOP Publishing Ltd.; 2020. p. 012003.
  20. Putri DA, Kaimuddin K, Mas’udin GA. Value added and business feasibility analysis of chili sauce products in Banggae District, Majene Regency. Anjoro Int J Agric Bus. 2022;3:65–72.
  21. Santosa R. Kelayakan finansial dan nilai tambah usaha agroindustri keripik ubi kayu di Kecamatan Saronggi Kabupaten Sumenep. CEMARA. 2018;14:21–34.
  22. Hermanuadi D, Brilliantina A, Novitasari EK. Value added analysis of cassava “tape” supply chain in Bondowoso regency. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. Jember: IOP Publishing Ltd.; 2021. p. 012021.