Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 67 Download : 37

Main Article Content

Abstract

Risks faced by agricultural actors in the food commodity sector can affect farmers' ability to meet food supply needs. Decreased production in rice commodities is one phenomenon that often occurs. The decline in production can be caused by various factors. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of land area, number of seeds, land fragmentation, and the extent of pest attacks on production yields and to determine the level of criticality of each risk faced by agricultural actors that affect production decline. This study uses Multiple Linear Regression analysis to determine the production factors that affect production yields and Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) is used to determine the level of criticality of the risks faced. The results of this study state that the variables of land area, seeds, and land fragmentation have a positive relationship to production yields while the variable area of pest attack has a negative relationship to production yields. In the FMEA analysis, it is known that the level of criticality of each risk faced by agricultural actors is the risk of supply to suppliers, production risk to farmers, social risk to farmer groups, and institutional risk to extension workers.

Keywords

Agriculture risk FMEA Production decline Regression

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Utari EAT, Zulfaridatulyaqin SM. Kontribusi sektor pertanian subsektor tanaman pangan terhadap PDRB pada Kabupaten Banjar (pendekatan PDRB hijau). Ecoplan. 2020;3(2):55–65.
  2. Lawolo O, Waruwu BA. Analisis risiko dan manajemen risiko usahatani padi di Kecamatan Gido, Kabupaten Nias, Provinsi Sumatera Utara. J Agribisnis Unisi. 2022;11(2):19–26.
  3. BPS-Statistics of Malang Regency. Malang Regency in Figures 2022. BPS-Statistics of Malang Regency. Malang Regency; 2022.
  4. BPS-Statistics of Malang Regency. Malang Regency in Figures 2023. BPS-Statistics of Malang Regency. Malang Regency; 2023.
  5. BPS-Statistics of Malang Regency. Malang Regency in Figures 2024 [Internet]. Vol. 545, BPS-Statistics Malang Regency. Malang Regency; 2024. Available from: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
  6. Wadu J, Yuliawati Y, Nuswantara B. Strategi menghadapi risiko produksi padi sawah di Kabupaten Sumba Timur. J Ekon dan Bisnis. 2019;22(2):231–56.
  7. Fauzan M. Efisiensi ekonomi usahatani padi lahan kering di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Agrimor. 2020;5(3):45–7.
  8. Hidayatullah ML, Aulia BU. Identifikasi dampak perubahan iklim terhadap pertanian tanaman padi di Kabupaten Jember. J Tek ITS. 2019;8(2):D143–8.
  9. Directorate General of Food Crops. Tantangan peningkatan produktivitas padi dan peran pupuk bersubsidi [Internet]. Directorate General of Food Crops, Agriculture Ministry of Indonesia; 2020. p. 18–20. Available from: http://tanamanpangan.pertanian.go.id/
  10. Fuad A, Ardiansyah AN, Nuraeni NS. Produktivitas lahan sawah dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan beras penduduk di Kecamatan Bojong, Kabupaten Tegal. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peran Geospasial dalam Membingkai NKRI. Cibinong: Badan Informasi Geospasial; 2016. p. 255–266.
  11. Usman K, Moonti U, Saleh SE. The effect of price, land area and production costs on rice farmer’s income: Case in Bone Bolango Regency. Jambura Equilib J. 2022;4(1):22–5.
  12. Alemu GT, Berhanie Ayele Z, Abelieneh Berhanu A. Effects of land fragmentation on productivity in Northwestern Ethiopia. Adv Agric. 2017;2017:1–9.
  13. Hindo SR, Purwaningsih T. Analysis of factors affecting rice production in Kulon Progo District in 2012-2017 using software R and Geoda. Int J Appl Bus Inf Syst. 2020;4(2):147–54.
  14. Jabnabillah F, Margina N. Analisis korelasi pearson dalam menentukan hubungan antara motivasi belajar dengan kemandirian belajar pada pembelajaran daring. J Sintak. 2022;1(1):14–8.
  15. Setiawati. analisis pengaruh kebijakan dividen terhadap nilai perusahaan pada perusahaan farmasi di BEI. J Inov Penelit. 2020;1(8):1581–90.
  16. Ayuwardani RP, Isroah I. Pengaruh informasi keuangan dan non keuangan terhadap underpricing harga saham pada perusahaan yang melakukan initial public offering (studi empiris perusahaan go public yang terdaftar di bursa efek tahun 2011-2015). Nominal Barom Ris Akunt dan Manaj. 2018;7(1):144–58.
  17. Firdausya FA, Indawati R. Perbandingan uji glejser dan uji park dalam mendeteksi heteroskedastisitas pada angka kematian ibu di Provinsi Jawa Timur tahun 2020. J Ners. 2023;7(1):793–6.
  18. Sanny BI, Dewi RK. Pengaruh net interest margin (NIM) terhadap return on asset (ROA) pada PT Bank Pembangunan Daerah Jawa Barat dan Banten Tbk periode 2013–2017. J E-Bis. 2020;4(1):78–87.
  19. Matulessy ER, Tambunan AU. Analisis regresi PLS sebagai alternatif dari regresi linear berganda: Studi kasus pengaruh luas lahan dan luas panen terhadap produksi padi di Kabupaten Manokwari. J Pendidik dan Konseling. 2023;5(1):3358–61.
  20. Zarliani W Al. Pengaruh faktor-faktor produksi terhadap produktivitas usaha tani padi sawah di Kelurahan Ngkari-Ngkari Kecamatan Bungi Kota Baubau. Sang Pencerah J Ilm Univ Muhammadiyah But. 2020;6(2):84–97.
  21. Nurhijjah, Astuti R, Kardinata H. Dampak serangan organisme pengganggu tanaman dan perubahan iklim terhadap produksi padi sawah di Sumatera Utara. J Ilm Magister Agribisnis. 2019;1(1):79–88.