Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 95 Download : 98

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This experimental research implemented Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) in teaching writing with interactive multimedia, aiming at exploring whether FCM can enhance the students’ writing ability. The research was conducted at the second semester students of English Department Students Islamic State University of Datokarama Palu.  This research assigned two groups namely experimental and control group. The sample was selected using taken by applying purposive sampling. A group of 18 students were taught by implementing flipped classroom model while in other group students were given conventional way. The Instrument of this research was writing decriptive test. The data obtained through the test were analyzed by using statistical analysis and SPSS 20.  Based on the result of research the mean score of post-test of experimental group (84.11) was higher than control group (75.52). The result of the t-test value (7.175) was higher than t-table value (2.000). In other words, H­0 was rejected and H1 was accepted. This means that implementing implementing flipped classroom model with interactive multimedia enhance the students’ writing ability significantly of the second grade students atof English Department Students Islamic State University of Datokarama Palu

Keywords

Flipped Classroom Model (FCM), Interactive Multimedia, Writing ability.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Rasmi, & Muhammad Ihsan. (2023). Implementing Flipped Classroom Model Integrated with Interactive Multimedia To Enhance Students’ Writing Ability at English Tadris Program of UIN Datokarama Palu. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 7(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v7i1.1844

References

  1. Atai, M. R. (2002). Iranian EAP programs in practice: A study of key methodological aspects. Sheikhbahaee ELT journal, 1(2), 1-15
  2. Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: an example of a critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 723-738.guo
  3. Brown, A. (1995). The effect of rater variables in the development of an occupation-specific Language Performance test. Language Testing 12: 1-15.
  4. Dunn, R. (2003). The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model: Theoretical Cornerstone, Research and Practical Applications. In Armstrong S. & Graff M. (Ed.), Bringing Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the 8th Annual European Learning Styles Information Network Conference. Hull: University of Hull.
  5. Entwistle, N. J. (1998). Improving Teaching through Research on Student Learning. In Forrest, J. J.F (Ed.), University teaching: International Perspectives. New York: Gerland.
  6. Fatemeh Rostami, Amir Mahdavi Zafarghandi. 2014. EAP Needs Analysis in Iran: The Case of University Students in Chemistry Department. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 924-934, July 2014 Finland: ACADEMY PUBLISHER
  7. Garcia, P., Amandi, A., Schiaffino, S. & Campo, M. (2007). Evaluating Bayesian Networks’Precision for Detecting Students’ Learning Styles. Computers & Education, 49, 794-808.
  8. Littlejohn, A., & Windeatt, S. (1989). Beyond language learning: Perspective on materials design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  9. Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1992). The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications
  10. Jolly, D., & Bolitho, R. (1998). A framework for materials writing. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 90–115). Cambridge: Cambridge Language Teaching Library, Cambridge University Press.
  11. Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Kolb, D. A. (1999). The Kolb’s Learning Styles Inventory. Boston: Hay Group
  13. Loo, R. (2004). Kolb’s learning styles and learning preferences: is there a linkage? Educational Psychology,24(1), 99-108.
  14. M. AL-Qahtani. online publish. (2015). Teachers’ Voice: A Needs Analysis of Teachers’ Needs for Professional Development with the Emergence of the Current English Textbooks. English Language Teaching; Vol. 8, No. 8; 2015 ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n8p128
  15. Ömer Gökhan Ulum.2015. A Needs Analysis Study for Preparatory class ELT Students. European Journal of English Language Teaching ISSN: 2501-7136 ISSN-L: 2501-7136 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu
  16. Richards, J.C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [34]
  17. Richterich, R. & Chancerel, J.L. (1984). A Frame Work for Investigating Learner Needs: Needs Analysis Extended to Curriculum Development. Electronic journal of foreign language.6 (2), 209-220