Article Sidebar
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study was based on the students’ needs regarding the instructional model of English teaching at the Biology Department. The objective of this study was to design English materials by combining YouTube and ABA (American and British Academy) Applications based on the students' needs analysis. The study was mixed-method research with the subject of the research was Biological students of Muhammadiyah University of Parepare, Indonesia. The result of the study was the instructional model focused on input, process, and output. In the input, there are goals and skills; in the process, there are learning activities and venues and in the output there is learning outcomes. The skills are listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Every skill consists of five activities. Listening skill consisted of five activities, namely hearing, understanding, remembering, responding, and evaluating. Speaking skill consisted of apprehending, synthesizing, analyzing, and evaluating. Reading skill consisted of reading, generating, comprehending, discussing, and evaluating. Writing consisted of pre-writing, composing, feedbacking, revising, and evaluating. There were two venues of the model. They were indoor and outdoor. Besides, the learning outcomes focused on cognitive, affective, and psychomotor
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
- Alias, Norlidah, Siti Hajar Abd Razak, Ghada elHadad, Nurul Rabihah Mat Noh Kokila Kunjambu, and Parimaladevi Muniandy. 2013. “A Content Analysis in the Studies of YouTube in Selected Journals.” Procedia
- - Social and Behavioral Sciences 103: 10–18. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.301.
- Dehghayedi, Mehdi, and Mohammad Sadegh Bagheri. 2018. “EFL Teachers’ Learning and Teaching Beliefs : Does Critical Thinking Make a Difference ?” International Journal of Instruction 11 (4): 223–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199901000- 00017.
- DeWitt, Dorothy, Norlidah Alias, Saedah Siraj, Mohd Yusaini Yaakub, Juhara Ayob, and Rosman Ishak. 2013. “The Potential of Youtube for Teaching and Learning in the Performing Arts.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 103 (November): 1118–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.439.
- Hanafiah, Waode, Muhammad Aswad, Harlinah Sahib, Abdul Hakim Yassi, and Movahede Sadat Mousavi. 2022. “The Impact of CALL on Vocabulary Learning, Speaking Skill, and Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: The Case Study of Indonesian EFL Learners.” Education Research International 2022 ( January): e5500077. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5500077.
- Irawan, Ade Gorbi, Ni Padmadewi, and Luh Putu Artini. 2018. “Instructional Materials Development through 4D Model” 00086: 1–4.
- Mangila, Benjamin B. 2018. “Are IMs Culturally Relevan T ?” A Critical Analysis of the Instructional Materials Used in Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education Program” 6 (2): 53–60.
- Merkuri, Zamira, and Aleksander Boboli. 2012. “Teaching Reading Strategies to Students Who Study Foreign Languages.” International Journal of Linguistics 4 (2): 323–33. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i2.1410.
- Sewang, Anwar, and Muhammad Aswad. 2021. “The Readiness of Learning Processes during the New Normal Era of the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE| 5 (1): 279–92. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i1.12822.
- Wallace, Igori, A Igori Wallace, and Egbodo Benson. 2016. “Effects of Instructional Materials on the Teaching and Learning of Social Studies In ...,” no. July.
- Zhao P. (2017). Chinese university students’ negotiation of epistemic voices upon transitioning into an English-mediated Linguistics module: The ASIAN EFL Journal. 13(1), 7-33.