Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 239 Download : 204

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

In an era where digital learning tools are reshaping the educational landscape, selecting the right language learning application becomes paramount, especially for institutions aiming to enhance their students' English proficiency. While numerous language applications exist, only a few are accessible without cost. This study zeroes in on two such free applications: ELSA and English Speaking Practice. The choice of these apps aimed to discern the instructional differences and their subsequent impact on learners. Conducted at SMK Negeri 17 Samarinda, the research involved two experimental classes: X Pharmacy 4 (33 students) and X Medical Laboratory Technology 1 (34 students). Using a Quasi-Experimental design, the study employed quantitative methods, including pre-test and post-test evaluations, to gauge the comparative effectiveness of the apps. The results were illuminating: the class utilizing ELSA witnessed a proficiency uptick of 15.21%, whereas the English Speaking Practice class observed a 13% increase. With a p-value of 0.000 <0.05, the data conclusively shows significant disparities in the efficacy of the two applications. This research underscores the importance of judiciously selecting digital tools in EFL contexts, ensuring optimal learning outcomes.

Keywords

EFL Students; ELSA; Digital Learning Tools; English Speaking Practice.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Arbain, Widi Syahtia Pane, & Raodah Mifdtahul Jannah. (2023). Comparative Efficacy of Elsa and English Speaking Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Study on EFL Learning Outcomes. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 7(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v7i1.2974

References

  1. Ali, Jamal Kaid Mohammed, Muayad Abdulhalim Shamsan, Rajakumar Guduru, and Nirmala Yemmela. 2019. “Attitudes of Saudi EFL Learners towards Speaking Skills.” Arab World English Journal 10 (2): 353–64.
  2. Alieto, E, B Abequibel, and C Ricohermoso. 2020. “An Investigation on Digital and Print Reading Attitudes: Samples from Filipino Preservice Teachers from a Non-Metropolitan-Based University.” Asian EFL Journal 27 (43): 278–311. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096061906&partnerID=40&md5=7a81c318b90521e7c4414d4ffca66b8b.
  3. Arbain, and Dedi Rahman Nur. 2017. “Techniques for Teaching Speaking Skill in Widya Gama Mahakam University.” Script Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching 2 (1): 13–25.
  4. Ardi, Priyatno, and Elvira Rianita. 2022. “Leveraging Gamification into EFL Grammar Class to Boost Student Engagement.” Teaching English with Technology 22 (2): 90–114.
  5. Aswad, Muhammad. 2017. “Is It Truly Improvisational Exercise Push Students’ Speaking Ability.” EDUVELOP 1 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v1i1.9.
  6. Creswell, John W. 2015. “Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Enhanced Pearson EText with Loose-Leaf Version--Access Card Package.” Pearson Education, Inc.
  7. Florentina Robert, Nia, and Widi Syahtia Pane. 2020. “Teacher’s Strategies in Teaching English Speaking to Young Learners.” Borneo Educational Journal (Borju) 2 (2): 60–67. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v2i2.627.
  8. Gracella, Jessy, and Dedi Rahman Nur. 2020. “Students’ Perception of English Learning through YouTube Application.” Borneo Educational Journal (Borju) 2 (1): 20–35. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v2i1.623.
  9. Gren, Lucas. 2020. “A Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Empirical Software Engineering.” IEEE Transactions on Education 63 (3): 155–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2960264.
  10. Han, Mengqing, and Shanshan Niu. 2021. “Application of Virtual Scenario Teaching in Spoken English Teaching.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 16 (18): 129. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i18.25659.
  11. Hao, Yungwei, Kathryn S. Lee, Szu-Ting Chen, and Sin Chie Sim. 2019. “An Evaluative Study of a Mobile Application for Middle School Students Struggling with English Vocabulary Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 95 (June): 208–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.013.
  12. Kaharuddin. 2022. “E-Learning During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Effect of the Grammar Translation Method and the Direct Method on Students’ English Competence.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 13 (2): 271–78. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.06.
  13. Katsarou, Eirene, Fridolin Wild, Areti-Maria Sougari, and Paraskevi Chatzipanagiotou. 2023. “A Systematic Review of Voice-Based Intelligent Virtual Agents in EFL Education.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 18 (10): 65–85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i10.37723.
  14. Lesmana, Belinda. 2022. “Using ELSA Speak Application to Improve Students’speaking Skill at UPT SPF SMPN 17 Makassar.” UNIVERSITAS BOSOWA.
  15. Liu, Ying, and Hong Yan. 2021. “Design and Implementation of an Intelligent Online English Learning System Based on Mobile Internet Technology.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 16 (24): 108–20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i24.27835.
  16. Mao, Lidan. 2018. “Application of Browser/Server Architecture in College English Online Learning System Design.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 13 (03): 129. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i03.8395.
  17. Muamar, Muamar, Andi Tenri Ampa, and A M St Asmayanti. 2022. “Improving the Students Pronunciation Using English Language Speech Assistant (ELSA) Application (A Pre-Experimental Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 9 Makassar).” Journal of Language Testing and Assessment 2 (2): 119–24.
  18. Ongoro, Catherine Akoth, and Yong-Yi Fanjiang. 2023. “Digital Game-Based Technology for English Language Learning in Preschools and Primary Schools: A Systematic Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3268282.
  19. Rinaepi, Rinaepi, Henni Rosa Triwardani, and Raysal Nur Azi. 2022. “The Effectiveness of Elsa Speak Application to Improve Pronunciation Ability.” Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan 3 (1): 28–33.
  20. Rindu, Ignatius, and Ariyanti Ariyanti. 2017. “Teacher’s Role in Managing the Class during Teaching and Learning Process.” Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching 2 (1): 83–100.
  21. Ringeisen, Tobias, Stephanie Lichtenfeld, Sandra Becker, and Nina Minkley. 2019. “Stress Experience and Performance during an Oral Exam: The Role of Self-Efficacy, Threat Appraisals, Anxiety, and Cortisol.” Anxiety, Stress, & Coping 32 (1): 50–66.
  22. Riyani, Tono Suwartono and Cici. 2019. “Authentic Assessment in Elt: Hopes, Challenges, and Practices.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan 9: 112–20.
  23. Selwyn, Neil. 2021. “Ed-Tech Within Limits: Anticipating Educational Technology in Times of Environmental Crisis.” E-Learning and Digital Media 18 (5): 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022951.
  24. Shi, Long. 2022. “Application of Big Data Language Recognition Technology and GPU Parallel Computing in English Teaching Visualization System.” Int. J. Speech Technol. 25 (3): 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-021-09904-1.
  25. Shu, Xiaoyang, and Xiaoqing Gu. 2023. “An Empirical Study of A Smart Education Model Enabled by the Edu-Metaverse to Enhance Better Learning Outcomes for Students.” Systems 11 (2): 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020075.
  26. Yilmazsoy, Burak, Mehmet Kahraman, and Utku Köse. 2020. “Negative Aspects of Using Social Networks in Education: A Brief Review on WhatsApp Example.” Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 3 (1): 69–90. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.662746.
  27. Zeeshan, Khaula, Timo Hämäläinen, and Pekka Neittaanmäki. 2022. “Internet of Things for Sustainable Smart Education: An Overview.” Sustainability 14 (7): 4293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074293.