Article Sidebar
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the teacher's written corrective feedback toward the students’ translation improvement. It is focused on the student's translation on lexical and grammatical mistakes in translating the source text into the target text. Translation is an activity that aims to facilitate the communication process by interpreting the information received in one language into another language. However, the mistakes while translating cannot be avoid by the translator or the students. The students are commonly done mistakes lexically and grammatically. To overcome the mistakes, the teacher will be a facilitator in correcting the student's translation. Implementing of written corrective feedback is provided teacher to correcting the student's mistakes by writing their comments, correction of errors, etc on the student's writing translation. Based on the analysis, the result indicates that the students make mistakes in translating, the students are most commonly made some mistakes in lexical and grammatical errors.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
- A. Abu Seileek and A. AbuAlsha’r. (2014) Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, vol. 18 (1), pp. 76- 95.
- Al-Essawi, S.F. (2010) Translated book about “The Annual Administrative Report”.AResearch for Fulfillments the requirements for Diploma of HADAF Center.
- Baker, M. (1992) In the Other Word: “A Course Book on Translation” London: Routledge. DOI: 10.1515/cllt Journal of Second Writing.
- Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of Different Types of Corrective feedback on ESL Students’ Writing.Journal of Second Language Writing, 14.
- Cepni, S. B. (2016). A Replication Study: Oral Corrective Feedback Types; Two Approaches Compared. Procedia Social and behavioral Sciences, 323, 520-528.
- C. V. Beuningen. (2010). Corrective -2013-0018, June 2013.
- Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in Support Of Written Corrective Feedback.
- feedback in L2 writing: theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, vol. 10 (2), p. 1- 27.
- Ellis. R. (2007). A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. ELT Journal, Vol. 62 (2), p. 97-107.
- Farrokhi, F., &Sattarpour, S. (2012). The Effect of Direct Written Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High-Proficient L2 Learner. World Journal of Education, 2(2) p.49-57.
- K. Rustipa. (2015). The Benefit of Indirect Comprehensive Error Corrections in Improving Advanced EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy. Proceedings: The 2nd International Languageand Language Teaching Conference, p. 551-557.
- Kaplan, R.S., & David, N. (1996).The Balanced Score Card: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
- Karim, K., &Nassaji, H. (2013). The Role of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing.
- Khalifa, Elsadig Mohamed. (2015). Problems in Translating English and Arabic Languages’ Structure: A Case Study of EFL Saudi Students in ShaqraUniversity. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Vol.3, No.4.
- Kim, K., &Clariana, R. B. (2015).Knowledge Structure Measure of Reader’s Situation Models Across Languages: Translation Engenders Richer Structure. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20, 249-268.
- Larson, L. M. (1984). Meaning Based translation, A guide TO Cross Language, Equivalence. Lanham: University Press of America.
- Lightbown, P.M & Spada, N. (1999). How Language Are Learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Meyer, B.J.F., & Poon, L.W. (2001). Effects of Structure Strategy Training and Signaling on Recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), p.141-159.
- Newmark, P. (1988). A Text Book of Translation. Prentice Hall, New York.
- Nida, E. and C.R Taber. (1991). The Theory and practice of Translation, Vol.2, No.1. P.20
- Nolan, J. (2005). “Behind Inverted Commas” Translation and Anglo-German Cultural Relations in the Interpretation: Technique and Exercises.
- Razali, R., & Jupri, R. (2014). Exploring Teacher written feedback and students revisions on ESL Students’ Writing. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19 (5), p.63-70.https://doi.org.10.9790/0837-19556370
- Sakka, Wahyuni, Muhammad Aswad, and Fajriani Fajriani. 2018. “Enhancement of English Student Learning Results through Total Physical Response (TPR) Method.” EDUVELOP (Journal of English Education and Development) 1 (2): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v1i2.31.
- S. Loewen. (2012). The role of feedback. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 24-40.
- Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learner’s Writing Improvement. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, 12 (1), p.7-17
- Y. Sheen. (2007). The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles. Tesol Quarterly, vol. 41 (2), p. 255-283.
- Yingjun, L. (2014). Status and Prospect of Machine translation and Translation Technology Research. Chinese Science & Technology Translators Journal, 01,24-27.