Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out how university instructors feel about incorporating Confucian local knowledge into English Language Teaching (ELT) for Generation Z students in higher education. Semi-structured interviews were used to gather data from six English lecturers at universities in Palembang, South Sumatra, using a qualitative case study design. Six interrelated themes emerged from the thematic analysis of Sumatra: the perceived applicability of Confucian values, pedagogical modifications for Generation Z, integration practices in ELT, implementation difficulties, lecturer beliefs and professional identity, and student. The results showed that when reframed to fit the traits and expectations of digital-native students, Confucian values like discipline, humility, respect for teachers, and lifelong learning remain pedagogically relevant. Various strategies, such as cross-cultural comparisons, the use of digital media, and storytelling, were employed by lecturers to render traditional wisdom accessible and meaningful. In addition to student resistance, curriculum inflexibility, and institutional constraints, the consistent application of value-based pedagogy was complicated by several challenges. The study emphasizes the dual function of lecturers as cultural mediators and language instructors who mediate conflicts between traditional values and modern learning environments. It is concluded that the integration of Confucian local wisdom in ELT not only improves linguistic proficiency but also cultivates ethical and intercultural awareness. This information contributes to the ongoing conversation regarding the localization of ELT practices in higher education, lecturer agency, and culturally responsive pedagogy.

Keywords

Teacher belief systems Value-based learning Youth engagement in language learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Lenny Marzulina, Meirizal, Farida, Hartono, & Sardianto Markos Siahaan. (2025). Confucian Local Wisdom in English Teaching: Higher Education Lecturers’ Views on Engaging Z Generation. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 9(1), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v9i1.5922

References

  1. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  2. Gong, S. X. (2024). Confucian educational traditions and teaching English as a foreign language [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing].
  3. Ho, I. T. (2020). Revisiting the Confucian heritage culture learning model: Contemporary perspectives on effort and achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09492-4
  4. Hu, R., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (n.d.). Learning characteristics and digital engagement of Generation Z students in higher education: A review of literature. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 12(1), 1–15.
  5. Huang, Y. S., & Asghar, A. (2018). Science education reform in Confucian learning cultures: Teachers’ perspectives on policy and practice in Taiwan. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9762-4.
  6. Li, J. (2020). The art of silence in Confucian teaching: Reflection and moral cultivation in language learning. Asian Education Studies, 5(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v5i1.727
  7. Liang, H., & Leng, L. (2024). Exploring factors influencing student critical thinking and questioning ability in Chinese secondary EFL classrooms. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4567890
  8. Liu, N. F., & Littlewood, W. (2023). From obedience to autonomy: Reinterpreting Confucian values in contemporary English language education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 36(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2135516
  9. Ma, Y. (2023). Teacher identity and moral responsibility in Confucian-influenced classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 126, 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104039
  10. Nasution, F. (2022). Kearifan lokal sebagai fondasi pendidikan karakter di Indonesia (Local wisdom as the foundation of character education in Indonesia) Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpk.v7i2.1301
  11. Nosidlak, K. (2024). Experienced learners from Generation Z and the traditional vision of the good language teacher: On the issue of teacher authenticity. CEEOL.
  12. Khan, S. (2024). Re-examining Confucian pedagogy in modern Asian classrooms: Between moral discipline and creative inquiry. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2204811
  13. Schenck, M. (2024). Learner receptivity to traditional moral education in digital-era classrooms: Insights from Confucian contexts. Journal of Moral Education, 53(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2187514
  14. Sedanza, M. A., Correos, C. T. C., & Sebial, M. U. (2023). Teacher beliefs and practices in English language teaching: A Gen Z perspective. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371234567
  15. Smith, S. (2023). Teacher voices in Chinese language teaching. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-89213-5.pdf
  16. Sun, L. (2024). Transforming pre-service EFL teacher education through critical cosmopolitan literacies: Voices from Mainland China. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(3), 251–267 https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2015753
  17. Tang, Y., Halili, S. H. B., & Razak, R. B. A. (2025). The influence of Confucian ethics and cultural values on teacher motivation in public middle schools in Southern China. Cultura Journal, 22(1), 15–27.
  18. Yanfeng, Y., & Andreevna, D. N. (2022). Multicultural blended teaching designs through Confucian philosophical cultural perspective of harmony in diversity. CyberLeninka.
  19. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
  20. Wang, X. (2022). Authority, respect, and dialogue in Confucian-influenced EFL classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 11(4), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.11n.4p.40