Main Article Content


The research problems of this research is what are the types and functions of speech acts that appear in discussion activities on speaking learning of 3rd semester students of Polytechnic ATI Makassar. The methods in this research is a descriptive qualitative method. The subject of this research is the 3rd semester Politechnic ATI Makassar students in class discussion activities. The results of the study can be described as follows. There are several types of speech acts found. Based on the action objectives of the speaker's perspective, Locutionary act, Illocution act, and perlocutionary act are found. Locutionary speech acts include news, questions and orders. Illocutionary speech acts include assertive, directive, expressive, commissive and declarative illocution


Speech Act, Locutionary Act, Illocutionary Act, Perlocutionary Act, Speaking Learning, Class Discussion.

Article Details

How to Cite
Muchsin, W. (2020). The Pragmatic Study of Speech Act Analysis in Discussion Activities on Speaking Learning . Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 3(2), 64-72.


  1. Austin, J.L (1969). Performative Constantive, an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  2. Aswad, Muhammad. 2017. “Is It Truly Improvisational Exercise Push Students’ Speaking Ability.” EDUVELOP (Journal of English Education and Development) 1 (1): 9–17.
  3. Aswad, Muhammad, Fathu Rahman, I.M Said, B Hamuddin, and Nur Fadillah Nurchalis. 2019. “A Software to Increase English Learning Outcomes: An Acceleration Model of English as the Second Language.” 2019.
  4. Fakhruddin, Zulfah, Amzah Selle, and Nur Fadillah Nurchalis. 2019. “Technology-Based Teaching Material Development Training for Pre-Service Teachers to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes.” NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching 10 (1): 87–102.
  5. Nurchalis, Nur Fadillah, Selviana Selviana, and Effran Ade Riza. 2019. “Activating Students to Speak English by Using ELTIS Resource Pack.” Loquen: English Studies Journal 12 (2`): 76–84.`.2092.
  6. Basra, S. M., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1),73-81.doi: (PDF) A Speech Act Analysis Of Teacher Talk In An Efl Classroom.
  7. Brown, G., & Yule,G. (1983).Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Chaer, Abdul dan Leonie Agustina. (2004). Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  9. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. (2015). Pragmatics and speech acts. University of Minnesota: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. www.carla.umn. edu/speechacts/index.html
  10. Fromkin, et al. (1988). An Introduction to Language. Third ed Sidney : Hartcourt Brace.
  11. Leech, G.N.1983 Principle of Pagmatics. London: Longman.
  12. Nurani, N. P. (2015). A pragmatic analysis of classroom speech acts in the English teaching and learning process at SMA N 1 Purworejo (A Case Study). (Unpublished Thesis). Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  13. Nurwahidah. (2014). Analisis Tindak Tutur Siswa SMP Negeri 19 Bulukumba dalam proses pembelajaran (Suatu Tinjauan Pragmatik). Tesis. Makassar: Pogram Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar.
  14. Oluremi, Ajewole-Orimogunje C. (2016). Speech acts and Welfarist Ideology in Governor Aregbesola’s May 1, (2013) Address. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 4(4), 23-32
  15. Searle,J.R. 1969. What is a Speech Act, An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Pres.
  16. Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching 48 (1): 1–50.
  17. Yule,G. (1996). Pragmatic. USA : Oxford UniversityPress.
  18. Wardhaugh,R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistic (5th Edition Oxford : Blackwell.