Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 7 Download : 3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Discrepancies between lecturers’ and students’ perceptions of formative assessment can weaken instructional alignment and reduce learning effectiveness in higher education. This study aimed to (1) describe formative assessment practices at STAIN Majene and (2) compare lecturers’ and students’ perceptions across five dimensions: learning objectives, monitoring, feedback, self-assessment, and peer assessment. Using a descriptive quantitative, cross-sectional design, questionnaire data were collected from 20 lecturers and 250 odd-semester students at STAIN Majene. The instrument consisted of 25 items and demonstrated acceptable internal consistency across dimensions, with combined Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from .70 to .83. Descriptive findings revealed that lecturers rated learning objectives (M = 4.38, SD = 0.533) and monitoring (M = 4.02, SD = 0.536) more positively, while students rated feedback most highly (M = 4.40, SD = 0.554). Inferential analysis using Welch’s independent-samples t test showed significant differences in learning objectives, t(21.71) = 8.115, p < .001, and feedback, t(24.51) = -10.289, p < .001, while monitoring and peer assessment did not differ significantly. Self-assessment showed a smaller difference at the .05 level, t(24.51) = -2.374, p = .026. Overall, the findings suggest that formative assessment at STAIN Majene remains stronger in lecturer-led practices than in learner-activating dimensions, particularly peer assessment. As an institutional study situated in a state Islamic higher education context in West Sulawesi, this research contributes empirical evidence on lecturer–student perceptual gaps and offers directions for strengthening learning objective transparency, sustaining effective feedback, and systematizing self- and peer-assessment practices.

Keywords

Formative Assessment; Lecturer–Student Perceptions; Learning Objectives; Feedback; Self-Assessment; Peer Assessment; STAIN Majene

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fachruddin, A. T. C. (2026). Formative Assessment Practiced in Higher Education: Lecturers’ and Students’ Perceptions. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 9(1), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v9i1.6166

References

  1. Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). Routledge.
  2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. Teachers College Record, 106(14), 20–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810410601402
  4. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050
  5. Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.
  6. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
  7. Brookhart, S. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2019). Classroom assessment and educational measurement. In Classroom assessment and educational measurement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507533
  8. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
  9. Christoforidou, M., & Kyriakides, L. (2021). Developing teacher assessment skills: The impact of the dynamic approach to teacher professional development. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101051
  10. Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
  11. Hansen, G. (2020). Formative assessment as a collaborative act: Teachers’ intention and students’ experience. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100904
  12. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  13. Hill, L., & Edwards, F. (2019). Student perceptions of their involvement in formative assessment feedback practices: “I can do it myself.” Assessment Matters, 13, 6–43. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0036
  14. Hoidn, S. (2016). The pedagogical concept of student-centred learning in the context of European higher education reforms. European Scientific Journal, 12(28), 439. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n28p439
  15. Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467124
  16. Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. L. (2019). Students’ formative assessment perceptions, feedback use and mathematics performance in secondary schools in Tanzania. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593103
  17. Mahmood, S. K., & Ghaleb, N. (2024). Kurdish EFL students’ perceptions towards summative and formative assessment at Salahaddin University. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 31(5), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.31.5.2024.25
  18. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
  19. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  20. Oswalt, S. G. (2013). Identifying formative assessment in classroom instruction: Creating an instrument to observe use of formative assessment in practice (Doctoral dissertation).
  21. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  22. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
  23. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
  24. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
  25. van der Kleij, F. M. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010
  26. Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M., & den Brok, P. (2021). We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101027
  27. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'