Response of garlic varieties growth towards the use of biological fertilizer

Authors

  • Suryani Dewi Universitas Sulawesi Barat
  • Dian Utami Zainuddin Universitas Sulawesi Barat
  • Andi Werawe Angka Universitas Sulawesi Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31605/anjoro.v3i2.1830

Keywords:

Garlic, Varieties, Organic fertiliser

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the response of local and imported garlic varieties' growth to biological fertilizer. The research was conducted in the Majene Regency, West Sulawesi, which began from April to July 2020. The research was arranged in a two-factor factorial Completely Randomized Design with 3 replications. The first factor is the variety of garlic which consists of two varieties, namely Sangga Sembalun and Kating. The second factor is the fertilizer that consists of three types, namely Trichoderma sp., Streptomyces sp., and Trichoderma sp. plus Streptomyces sp. The observations were made at the age of 7, 15, 30, and 45 DAS (Days After Sowing) where the parameters measured were the height of the plant (cm), the number of leaves (blade), the diameter of the bulb (cm) for each treatment. The observation data will be analyzed using the analysis of variance. The analysis of variance for the observation data used the F-test at a 5% significance level. Statistically, the findings of the research show that the treatments given are not significantly affected all parameters observed. The highest mean score on the treatment of biological fertilizers was the Trichoderma sp. plus Streptomyces sp. bacteria on both varieties tested.  The results showed that in general, the biological fertilizer Trichoderma sp. plus Streptomycetes sp., gave better results, but it cannot be concluded that the imported Kating variety gave a better response than the local Sangga variety to all parameters, because the morphological or genetic characteristics of Kating and Sangga Sembalun may be also different.

References

BPS. Produksi Tanaman Sayuran 2021 [Internet]. Badan Pus. Stat. Indones. 2021 [cited 2022 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/55/61/1/produksi-tanaman-sayuran.html

Sudaryono T. Respon tanaman bawang merah terhadap pemupukan boron. Agrika [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Oct 17];11:161–9. Available from: http://publishing-widyagama.ac.id/ejournal-v2/index.php/agrika/article/view/485

Hapsari LW, Saptadi D. Respon beberapa varietas bawang putih (Allium sativum L.) dalam pertumbuhan dan potensi pembentukan umbi mikro terhadap pemberian berbagai konsentrasi sukrosa. J Produksi Tanam [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 17];6:2166–74. Available from: http://protan.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/protan/article/view/893

Mardiyanto TC, Pangestuti R. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi respon petani terhadap teknologi budidaya bawang merah ramah lingkungan di Kabupaten Tegal. AGRITEXTS J Agric Ext [Internet]. Universitas Sebelas Maret; 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 17];42:106–18. Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/agritexts/article/view/43314

Syahriyah N, Widyastuti R, Nugroho B. Pengujian efektifitas pupuk hayati majemuk pada tanaman kedelai (Glycine max) [Internet]. IPB; 2014. Available from: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/68965

Sukmadi RB. Aktivitas fitohormon indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) dari beberapa isolat bakteri rizosfer dan endofit. J Sains dan Teknol Indones. 2012;14:221–7.

Dhanasekaran D, Jiang Y, editors. Actinobacteria - basics and biotechnological applications. IntechOpen; 2016.

Wang J, Shi L, Wang D, Li L, Loake GJ, Yang X, et al. White rot disease protection and growth promotion of garlic (Allium sativum) by endophytic bacteria. Plant Pathol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2019;68:1543–54.

Kafrawi K. Skrining isolat plant growth promoting rhizobacteri (PGPR) dari pertanaman bawang merah (Allium ascalonicum) di Gorontalo. Pros Semin Nas Mikrobiol Kesehat dan Lingkung. Makassar: UIN Alauddin Makassar; 2015. p. 132–9.

Syamsi A, Nelvia N, Puspita F. Respon bawang merah (Allium ascalonicum. L) terhadap pemberian trichokompos TKKS terformulasi dan pupuk nitrogen pada lahan gambut. J Phot. 2015;6:5–13.

Downloads

210 Views
180 Downloads
Data indexed from system logs

Published

2022-10-17

Issue

Section

Journal Articles