Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Rice serves as the main dietary staple for most Indonesians. The preference of environmentally conscious consumers reflects their liking or disliking of the different types of rice available. Satisfaction, in this context, refers to consumers' evaluations of their expectations when purchasing and consuming rice. It involves comparing their level of satisfaction with the actual performance of the rice after consumption. The study aims to analyze the eco-friendly preference and consumer satisfaction with the attributes of rice in Toboali Bangka Selatan. Convenience sampling was applied to collect the respondents of the study. Convenience Sampling was the technique where the sampling was conducted on consumers who were currently at home and willing to fill out the provided questionnaire. Surveys conducted through direct personal interactionTop of Form, observation, and focus group discussion were employed as the data collection technique. Importance-performance analysis (IPA) and customer satisfaction index (CSI) were used in processing the data. The study revealed that the eco-friendly preference and the quality of the eco-friendly rice had a positive impact on total consumer satisfaction which was fulfilled by the attributes of rice with 69 %. The rest such as price, taste, and ease of access were not satisfied as the important attributes were not well performed. Furthermore, the CSI score illustrated that the satisfaction of eco-friendly consumers in all classes was at the “satisfied” status.

Keywords

Eco-friendly Rice Satisfaction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Oktrisa T, Sayekti, Wuryaningsih Dwi Listiana I. Persepsi, preferensi dan pola konsumsi makanan jajanan berbasis singkong terhadap remaja: Kasus di SMAN 2 Bandar Lampung dan SMAN 1 Tumijajar Tulang Bawang Barat. JIIA 2015;3:219–27. https://doi.org/10.23960/jiia.v3i2.%p.
  2. Muttaqim H. Analisis pengaruh pendapatan kepala keluarga terhadap konsumsi rumah tangga di Kecamatan Bandar Sakti Kota Lhokseumawe tahun 2014. Lentera 2015;15:92–4.
  3. Haque A, Nayeem AR, Hossain MN, Abdullah F, Sarker MNI, Akter MF. Factors affecting on consumer’s purchase intention towards eco-friendly products in Malaysia. Issues Bus Manag Econ 2020;8:72–83. https://doi.org/10.15739/IBME.20.007.
  4. Suryana A, Purwoto A. Perspektif dan dinamika penawaran, permintaan dan konsumsi pangan. Agro-Ekonomika PERHEPI (Perhimpunan Ekon Pertan Indones 1998;28:1–16.
  5. Lockshin L, Corsi AM. Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Econ Policy 2012;1:2–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2012.11.003.
  6. Lee PY, Leong SY, Oey I. The role of protein blends in plant-based milk alternative: A review through the consumer lens. Trends Food Sci Technol 2024;143:104268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104268.
  7. Uzir MUH, Jerin I, Al Halbusi H, Hamid ABA, Latiff ASA. Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates? Heliyon 2020;6:e05710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05710.
  8. Yuniarti. Analisis perilaku konsumen produk beras kemasan pada kaum wanita. Bogor Agricultural University, 2002.
  9. Wijayanti MR. Analisi Preferensi Konsumen dalam Membeli Daging Sapi di Pasar Tradisional Kabupaten Karanganyar 2011.
  10. Laizer JS, Baharanyi NR, Zabawa R, Kadigi RMJ. Determinants of consumer preference for and expenditure on rice in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania. Prof Agric Work J 2018;6:26–41.
  11. Ihwah A, Putri RAM, Deoranto IADP. Analysis of consumers’ preference on taro-flavored UHT ultra milk using conjoint method in Malang City. Adv Food Sci Sustain Agric Agroindustrial Eng 2020;3:91–100. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.afssaae.2020.003.02.7.
  12. Marbun D, Priyono BS, Suryanty M. Analisis persepsi, sikap dan perilaku konsumen terhadap pancake durian (studi kasus: Pancake durian produksi Celebrity Pancake). J AGRISEP 2015;14:215–26. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.14.2.215-226.
  13. Andriyani F, Astuti R, Effendi M. Preferensi konsumen terhadap produk keripik buah So Kressh menggunakan analisis konjoin. Universitas Brawijaya, 2014.
  14. Fadjarajani S, Rosali ES, Patimah S, Liriwati FY, Nasrullah, Sriekaningsih A, et al. Metodologi penelitian: Pendekatan multidisipliner. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing; 2020.
  15. Trianto A. Analisis preferensi konsumen pada makanan olahan industri rumah tangga pangan berlabel “Krintang” di Jambi Selatan. Universitas Terbuka, 2018.
  16. Wahyuni T, Nurliza, Kurniati D. Preferensi konsumen terhadap pembelian kerupuk ikan di Kota Sintang. J Soc Econ Agric 2017;6:101–8. https://doi.org/10.26418/j.sea.v6i1.21592.
  17. Budiman JA, Nugroho BA, Utami HD. Consumer preference analysis towards purchasing decisions of honey bee in Blitar City. Fak Peternak Univ Brawijaya Malang 2014.
  18. Imami D, Zhllima E, Merkaj E, Chan-Halbrendt C, Canavari M. Albanian consumer preferences for the use of powder milk in cheese-making: A conjoint choice experiment. Agric Econ Rev 2016;17:20–33.
  19. Aji JMM, Widodo A. Perilaku konsumen pada pembelian beras bermerk di Kabupaten Jember dan faktor yang mempengaruhinya. J Sos Ekon Pertan 2010;4:12–24.
  20. Alamsyah I. Analisis perilaku konsumen dalam keputusan pembelian sayuran organik di Giant Taman Yasmin Bogor. IPB University, 2010.
  21. Aoki K, Akai K, Ujiie K, Shimmura T, Nishino N. The impact of information on taste ranking and cultivation method on rice types that protect endangered birds in Japan: Non-hypothetical choice experiment with tasting. Food Qual Prefer 2019;75:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.11.021.
  22. Wuryandani S. Prioritized attributes on black rice product development: Kano model application. Agroindustrial J 2021;8:581–90. https://doi.org/10.22146/aij.v8i2.76727.
  23. Mulya Handayani S, Jamhari, Rahayu Waluyati L, Handoyo Mulyo J. Consumer satisfaction on wetland rice agro-tourism in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 518, Semarang: IOP Publishing; 2020, p. 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/518/1/012061.
  24. Anić I-D. Attitudes and purchasing behavior of consumers in domestic and foreign food retailers in Croatia. Zb Rad Ekon Fak Au Rijeci 2010;28:113–33.
  25. Al-Hassan RM, Agbekpornu HG, Sarpong DB. Consumer preferences for rice quality characteristics in Accra and the effects of these preferences on price. Agric Food Sci J Ghana 2008;7:575–91. https://doi.org/10.4314/afsjg.v7i1.43035.
  26. Sunaryati R, Muhaimin AW. Analysis of lowland rice peat land in Mampai Village, Kapuas Murung District, Kapuas-Kalimantan Central District. Anjoro Int J Agric Bus 2022;3:19–25. https://doi.org/10.31605/anjoro.v3i1.1422.
  27. Isaskar R, Dwiastuti R, Baladina N, Aprilia A, Budi-S. P. Consumer satisfaction index (CSI) of subsidized certified rice seeds attributes at Malang Regency, East Java, Indonesia. Int J Soc Local Econ Gov 2018;4:14–9.
  28. Mameno K, Kubo T. Mainstreaming eating agrobiodiversity: Appealing with heron labels and boosting with loach labels. Food Qual Prefer 2023;109:104919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104919.