Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 11 Download : 9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The rapid expansion of web-based distance learning (WBDL) in higher education has significantly changed English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction, particularly in universities that implemented a distance learning system where flexibility and technological integration are vital. While most research focuses on technology or students, this study explores how English as a Foreign Language (EFL) tutors at an Indonesian university perceive web-based distance learning. Employing a descriptive qualitative design within an interpretive paradigm conceptually grounded in Qiong's (2017) six-dimension framework, the study analyzes interview data from two experienced tutors. The tutor was intentionally chosen to facilitate an in-depth, rich, and detailed comparative analysis of their subjective psychological perceptions, aligning with the study's interpretive paradigm, which seeks depth over generalizability. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, then thematically analyzed with multiple rounds of open coding, thematic grouping, and interpretive synthesis in order to establish how tutors' perceptions reflected their negotiation between institutional expectations and professional agency. The results illustrate a key tension reflecting the study's central dichotomy: one tutor prioritizes institutional structure and professionalism, while the other emphasizes pedagogical autonomy and learner-centeredness. The study concludes that successful web-based distance learning requires a dynamic psychological balance between the system and autonomy. Practically, these findings suggest that institutions must move beyond mere technical training and provide robust psychological and affective support, recognizing tutors as critical agents in negotiating this balance rather than just as system operators.

Keywords

Web-based distance learning; EFL tutors’ psychological perception; Institutional demands; Pedagogical autonomy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Sukmawati Tono Palangngan, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Sukmawati Tono Palangngan is a doctoral student of English Education Study Program at Postgraduate of State University of Makassar

Sukardi Weda, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Prof. Dr. Sukardi Weda is a professor of English Department State University of Makassar and Graduate Program State University of Makassar. His interest is linguistics, English Language Studies, applied linguistics, social & cultural studies, management, communication, human resource, etc.

Nurdin Noni, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Prof. Dr. Nurdin Noni is a professor of English Department State University of Makassar and Graduate Program State University of Makassar. 

Rahayu, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Dr. Rahayu, S.Pd., M.Pd is a lecturer at postgraduade program of State University of Makassar.

How to Cite
TONO PALANGNGAN, S., Sukardi Weda, Nurdin Noni, Rahayu, & Wan Yusoff Wan Shaharuddin. (2026). Balancing Structure and Autonomy: EFL Tutors’ Psychological Perceptions in Web-based Distance Learning. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 9(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v9i1.5785

References

  1. Borg, S. (2018). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. De Vega, N., & Rahayu. (2023). Enhancing English Learning: Self-Determination in Indonesia Digital Classrooms. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 6(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v6i2.6611
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  5. Denzin N, L. Y. (2013). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (Third Edit). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/244ccfaf-d20d-30f3-9c47-1602cc446ef8/
  6. Evans, L. (2011). The ‘Shape’ of Teacher Professionalism in England: Professional Standards, Performance Management, Professional Development, and the Changes Proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.607231
  7. Farrell, T. S. C. (2020). Reflective Practice in Language Teaching: The Development of Reflective Thinking. Routledge.
  8. Gao, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Teacher Learning in Difficult Times: Examining Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions about Online Teaching to Tide over COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 549653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549653
  9. Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice (3 (ed.)). Routledge.
  10. Huang, R., Liu, D., Tlili, A., Knyazeva, S., & Chang, T.-W. (2020). Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning during Educational Disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in the COVID-19 Outbreak. UNESCO.
  11. Martin F. (2022). Examining research on the impact of distance and online learning: A second-order meta-analysis study. Educational Research Review, 36. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100438
  12. Moore, M. G. (2013). The Theory of Transactional Distance BT—Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 66–85). Routledge.
  13. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (2 (ed.)). University of California Press.
  14. Olaf Zawacki-Richter and Terry Anderson. (2014). Introduction: Research Areas in Online Distance Education. In Zawacki-Richter Olaf (Ed.), Online Distance Education: Towards a Research Agenda (p. 1). Athabasca University. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781927356623.003
  15. Olcott D. (2021). Open and distance education theory revisited: implications for the digital era. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(1), 105–108. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1859998
  16. Qiong, O. U. (2017). A Brief Introduction to Perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.3968/10055
  17. Rahayu, & Weda, S. (2024). Interplay of Technology and Self-Determination in Enhancing Writing Skills. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.51.2.1
  18. Smith, R. (2008). Learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 62(4), 395–397. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn038
  19. Sun, P.-C., & Chen, H. (2016). Online Education and Its Effective Practice: A Research Review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
  20. White, C. (2021). Teacher Identity and Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching. Routledge.
  21. Xin Zhang, J. E. M. (2020). What Is the Influence of Peer Feedback and Author Response on Chinese University Students’ English Writing Performance? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.259
  22. Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). The State of Open and Distance Education. Springer