Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 10 Download : 5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to explore the constraints that hinder the realization of critical thinking in students’ oral argumentation in higher education contexts. The study employed an interpretive qualitative case study design. The participants were four purposively selected lecturers who teach speaking courses emphasizing argumentative discussion at Universitas Muhammadiyah Bone. They had at least one semester of experience facilitating academic speaking activities and were selected through maximum variation sampling to capture diverse instructional perspectives. Data were collected through classroom observations, audio recordings of academic speaking activities, and interviews with lecturers. Thematic analysis was conducted iteratively to identify recurring linguistic, affective, and pedagogical constraints. The findings indicate that students’ oral argumentation is largely dominated by descriptive claims, with limited use of evidence, warrants, and rebuttals, revealing a gap between students’ critical thinking potential and their oral performance. This gap is affected by related language issues, like having a small vocabulary and not speaking smoothly; emotional factors, such as anxiety and fear of being judged; and teaching conditions, like not having enough training in argumentation and support for academic reading and writing. The study concludes that critical thinking in oral argumentation should be understood as a context-dependent and discursive practice rather than merely an individual cognitive ability. So, the research highlights the importance of teaching methods that combine language skills, emotional support, and clear training in argumentation to help improve critical thinking through speaking in higher education.

Keywords

Critical Thinking; Oral Argumentation; Learning Constraints; Higher Education

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Gunawan, Sahril, Amirullah Abduh, Samtidar, & Muhammad Jafar. (2026). Oral Argumentation under Constraints: A Qualitative Study of Critical Thinking in Indonesian Higher Education. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 9(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v9i1.6216

References

  1. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.
  2. Bao, L., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). The impact of scaffolding on students’ online argumentation and critical thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2281–2302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09998-0
  3. Berg, T., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. The American Journal of Psychology, 103(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/1423219
  4. Bezanilla, M. J., Fernandez-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Dominguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584
  5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw-Hill Education.
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.
  7. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. H. Douglas Brown. In 2004.
  8. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.
  10. Cui, R., & Teo, P. (2023). Thinking through talk: Using dialogue to develop students’ critical thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104068
  11. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power and Pedagogy. In Language, Power and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596773
  12. Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (2022). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. DeKeyser, R. (2020). Skill Acquisition Theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-5
  14. Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical thinking: Reflection and perspective. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 4–18.
  15. Ericsson, K. A. (2012). The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816796.038
  16. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking : A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction Executive Summary “ The Delphi Report. The California Academic Press, 423(c).
  17. Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
  18. Fisher, A. (2011). Critical Thinking An Introduction Second Edition. In Cambridge University.
  19. Garcia, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587891
  20. Gee, J. P. (2018). Introducing Discourse Analysis: From Grammar to Society. Routledge.
  21. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data at Scale. SAGE Publications.
  22. Hannken-Illjes, K. (2018). Argumentation Analysis in Discourse Studies. Springer.
  23. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
  24. Hu, X., & Liu, Y. (2025). Exploring Argument Structure Development in EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00944-0
  25. Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
  26. Kuhn, D. (2018). Arguing to learn: Argumentation as a pathway to developing thinking skills. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1458160
  27. Kuhn, D. (2022). 7. The Skills of Argument. In Education for Thinking. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039797-007
  28. Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2019). Dialogic teaching and students’ engagement in collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1644457
  29. Li, S., Xu, M., & Wang, H. (2024). Understanding EFL learners’ willingness to communicate dynamics during a group communicative task: An idiodynamic perspective. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104621
  30. Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Lyle, J. (2018). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861–878.
  32. Macintyre, P. D., Dornyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
  33. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9456-0
  34. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.
  35. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
  36. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2020). Argumentation-based computer-supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 31, 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100361
  38. Nussbaum, E. M., Dove, I. J., & Putney, L. G. (2023). Bridging dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory through critical questions. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 11. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.548
  39. Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2018). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347.
  40. Patton, M. Q. (2019). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.
  41. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  42. Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2021). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 497–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09579-4
  43. Ridge, E. (2008). R Carter and D Nunan (Eds). 2001. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press. 294 pp. Per Linguam, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5785/17-1-135
  44. Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications.
  45. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching Vocabulary. In Researching Vocabulary. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
  46. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. In Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357
  47. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
  48. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
  49. van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Argumentation Theory: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Springer.
  50. Vanderplank, R. (2012). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action. System, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.004
  51. Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4). https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32
  52. Zare, P., & Othman, M. F. (2021). Students’ critical thinking in oral argumentative tasks: Challenges and pedagogical implications. System, 97, 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102441