Analysis of Preservice Physics Teachers’ Thinking Processes in Solving Force Concept Inventory Item Using Eye Tracking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31605/sipamandaq.v1i1.6911Keywords:
Eye Tracking, Conceptual Understanding, Force Concept Inventory, Preservice Physics Teacher, Visual AttentionAbstract
Understanding students' conceptual reasoning in physics cannot be adequately explained through correct or incorrect answers alone, as conventional assessments provide limited information about the cognitive processes underlying problem solving. Although eye-tracking technology has been increasingly applied in educational research, its use to investigate students' visual attention while solving conceptual physics problems, particularly the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), remains limited. This study aimed to analyze students' visual attention patterns during the completion of an FCI question using eye-tracking technology. A descriptive study was conducted involving ten undergraduate students in a Physics Education program. Eye-movement data were collected using GazeRecorder with the built-in laptop camera while participants solved one FCI question. The analysis focused on dwell time, and heatmap across eight predefined Areas of Interest (AOIs). The results indicated that students primarily allocated their visual attention to the problem description and illustration before evaluating the answer options. Students who selected the correct answer generally exhibited greater attention to the correct alternative, whereas those selecting incorrect options devoted more attention to the distractors they ultimately chose. These findings demonstrate that eye tracking provides valuable insights into students' conceptual reasoning beyond conventional test scores and has considerable potential as a diagnostic assessment tool for identifying misconceptions in physics learning.
References
Adıgüzel, O. C., Esen, E., & Şahin Kölemen, C. (2026). A systematic review of eye-tracking technology in higher education: implications for effective feedback practices. Frontiers in Education, 11(1872398), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1872398
Badruldin, N. A., & Alias, S. N. (2022). Level of Conceptual Understanding Among Secondary Students on Topic of Forces and Motion Using Half-Length Force Concept Inventory (HFCI). ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities , 1(2 SE-Articles), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i2.2.2022
Becker, S., Knippertz, L., Ruzika, S., & Kuhn, J. (2023). Persistence, context, and visual strategy of graph understanding: Gaze patterns reveal student difficulties in interpreting graphs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 20142. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020142
Bendjebar, S., Lafifi, Y., Boudjehem, R., & Laouissi, A. (2026). Data-Driven Insights into E-Learning: A Comprehensive Review of Eye-Tracking Applications in Learning Systems. In Journal of Eye Movement Research (Vol. 19, Issue 2, p. 41). https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19020041
Bouzid, T., Darhmaoui, H., & Kaddari, F. (2025). Force and motion misconceptions in Moroccan high school science majors: insights from video game activity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(4), 1247–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2428618
Falch, L., & Lohan, K. S. (2024). Webcam-based gaze estimation for computer screen interaction. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 11(1369566). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1369566
Faria, A. da S. R. de, Silveira, M. V. da, & Santos, A. C. F. dos. (2025). A bibliographic review of the difficulties related to the topics of mechanics. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(1 SE-Articles), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i1.50
García-Romero, M., Martínez-Rojas, A., González Enríquez, J., & Jiménez-Ramírez, A. (2025). Exploring Webcam Eye Tracking Software for Robotic Process Automation: A Pilot Benchmarking Study BT - Research Challenges in Information Science (J. Grabis, T. E. J. Vos, M. J. Escalona, & O. Pastor (eds.); pp. 470–485). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Hahn, L., & Klein, P. (2022). Eye tracking in physics education research: A systematic literature review. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.013102
Hao, S., Pan, H., & Zhang, D. (2025). A Process-Oriented Approach to Assessing High School Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Competence: Insights from Multidimensional Eye-Tracking Analysis. In Education Sciences (Vol. 15, Issue 6, p. 761). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060761
Helle, L. (2017). PROSPECTS AND PITFALLS IN COMBINING EYE TRACKING DATA AND VERBAL REPORTS. Frontline Learning Research, 5, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i3.254
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3).
Hoogerbrugge, A. J., Hooge, I. T. C., Hessels, R. S., & Strauch, C. (2025). When is enough enough? Empirical guidelines to determine participant sample size for scene viewing studies. Behavior Research Methods, 57(9), 241. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02754-8
Hu, Y., Wu, B., & Gu, X. (2017). An Eye Tracking Study of High- and Low-Performing Students in Solving Interactive and Analytical Problems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 300–311. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26229225
Jielili, K., Yao, Z., Zhang, S., Lan, M., & Yao, J. (2026). Dual-diagnostic approach for jointly estimating students’ conceptual understanding and misconceptions in forces and motion. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 22(1), 10133. https://doi.org/10.1103/hrx4-gpd2
Ke, F., Liu, R., Sokolikj, Z., Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., & Israel, M. (2024). Using eye-tracking in education: review of empirical research and technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 1383–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10342-4
Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2016). Student Misconceptions about Force and Acceleration in Physics and Engineering Mechanics Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 19–29.
Liu, J., Zhong, X., Chen, G., & Chen, L. (2026). Building a diagnostic model for misconceptions in physics education using eye tracking technology. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 22(2), 20105. https://doi.org/10.1103/ttrq-px6t
Liu, X., & Cui, Y. (2025). Eye tracking technology for examining cognitive processes in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 229, 105263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105263
Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., & Sayre, E. C. (2013). Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: What is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(2), 20121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020121
Muna, K., & Bahit, M. (2020). Eye-tracking and metacognitive skills: A review on the use of eye-tracking for measuring students’ metacognitive skills in chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 12033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012033
Muna, K., & Bahit, M. (2023). Eye Tracking Trends in Chemistry Learning: Bibliometric Study 2018-2023 on Google Scholar with VOSviewer and Pivot Table. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 12(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v12i3.76885
Muna, K., Rahmawati, H., Bahit, M., Rasid, S., Marisa, L., Rosana, R., & Istiqamah, N. (2025). Online Eye-Tracking: Observing the Attention of Pre-service Chemistry Teacher from Non-Science Backgrounds in Solving Chemistry Problems. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia); Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 10(2), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v10i2.96748
Selivanova, A., & Krabbe, P. F. M. (2018). Eye tracking to explore attendance in health-state descriptions. PloS One, 13(1), e0190111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190111
Sevcenko, N., Appel, T., Ninaus, M., Moeller, K., & Gerjets, P. (2023). Theory-based approach for assessing cognitive load during time-critical resource-managing human–computer interactions: an eye-tracking study. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-022-00398-y
Taqwa, M. R. A., Sulman, F., & Faizah, R. (2022). College Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion: Research Focus on Resource Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1), 12073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012073
Tóthová, M., & Rusek, M. (2025). Eye Tracking in Science Education Research: Comprehensive Literature Review. Science & Education, 34(6), 4583–4626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00644-1
Wang, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2023). Combining eye-tracking and verbal reports in vocabulary research: Benefits and challenges. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100063
Wang, Q., Yang, S., Liu, M., Cao, Z., & Ma, Q. (2014). An eye-tracking study of website complexity from cognitive load perspective. Decision Support Systems, 62, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.02.007
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurlina Nurlina, Nursakinah Annisa Lutfin, Aulia Rahmadhani, Irsan Irsan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.