Neuro-Linguistic Programming Implementation Challenges in EFL Speaking Instruction: An Ethnographic Inquiry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v9i2.6652

Keywords:

Challenges, EFL Speaking Instruction, Ethnographic Inquiry, Neuro-Linguistic Programming

Abstract

Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) is a structured pedagogical approach that integrates cognitive, affective, linguistic, and experiential dimensions in EFL speaking instruction. Although NLP has been considered theoretically promising, the practical challenges of its implementation in Indonesian higher education remain underexplored. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the challenges encountered by an EFL lecturer during NLP implementation in speaking instruction. Employing a qualitative ethnographic design, data were collected over one full academic semester at UIN Saizu Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, through in-depth interviews, participatory classroom observation, weekly student self-reflection, and documentary evidence. One experienced NLP-practising lecturer and twenty-five purposively selected students participated in the study. Data were analysed through ethnographic procedures involving inductive coding, contextual interpretation, and multi-source triangulation. Findings reveal five interconnected challenge dimensions: instructional design complexity, conceptual comprehension barriers, time constraints, linguistic challenges during speaking practice, and reflective evaluation difficulties. These findings collectively reconceptualise NLP as instructionally demanding and contextually grounded framework rather than a universally applicable method, contributing a rare ethnographic perspective to NLP research in Indonesian EFL higher education. Future research should examine institutional support strategies, including structured lecturer training, curriculum flexibility, and assessment reform, as well as conduct comparative studies across lecturers at varying NLP competency levels to determine whether the identified challenges are inherent to NLP as a pedagogical system or contingent on practitioner expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alshaye, R. A. (2024). Integrating Reflective Teaching with Dynamic Assessment to Enhance EFL Teachers’ Autonomy, Self-assessment, and Communication Skills. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 15(3), 48–66. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no3.4

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). A Book Review: Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed., Issue 1). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.13187/rjs.2017.1.30

Farrell, T. S. C. (2022). Reflective Practice in Language Teaching (Vol. 4415). Cambridge university Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781009028783

Fidinillah, M. A. (2017). The Effects of Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP)Methods Towards Students’ Speaking Skill. Journal of English Language Teaching, 02(01), 56–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v2i01.2273

Fraga, L., & Bobadilla, M. (2025). Self-assessment with Rubrics as a Key Tool in the EFL Classroom for. MEXTESOL Journal, 49(1), 0–3.

Franscy, F., & Ramli, R. (2022). Problems Encountered by Indonesian EFL Learners in Mastering Speaking Skills. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 14(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v14i1.1176

Gabriela, A., Macías, D., & Dack, T. F. (2023). The impact of reflective journals on the writing skills of EFL sophomore students. Runas. Journal of Education and Culture, 4(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46652/runas.v4i7.100

Ginting, S. A., & Hartati, R. (2023). Neuro-linguistic Programming in the English Classroom: Perceptions and Applications Among Teachers. VELES (Voices of English Language Education Society), 7(2), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i2.22549

Grinder, & Bandler. (1975). The structure of magic I: A book about language and therapy. Science and Behavior Books.

Haidir, A. (2024). Neuro-Linguistic programing As A Teaching method to Improve Foreign Languahe Teaching in Indonesian EFL Classroom. Hybrid National Conference (NHC) 2024Proceeding, 1(1), 11–18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391193579

John, A., Selvaraj, V., Thennavan, S., Kumar, K., Ponnudurai, R., & Shamsudeen, G. (2025). The Impact of Neuro-Linguistic Programming on Speaking Skills: An Intervention Study. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 862–875. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.9274

Jones, J. S., & Watt, S. (2010). Ethnography in Social Science Practice. Routledge.

Khasinah, S., Akmal, S., Izza, K., Farhan, M., Ar-raniry, U. I. N., & Yogyakarta, N. (2024). Examining Students ’ Linguistic and Non- Linguistic Speaking Issues and Coping Strategies in English Presentations. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1290–1315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.30709

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press Inc.

Millrood, R. (2004). The role of NLP in teachers ’ classroom discourse. ELT Journal, 58(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.1.28

Murti, P., Baso, J., & Samtidar, S. (2022). Students’ English Speaking Difficulties and Teachers’ Strategies in English Teaching: A Case Study at SMA 10 Gowa. Journal of English Education and Literature, 1(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.26858/performance.v1i1%20August.36753

Mustafari, A., Dollah, S., & Salija, K. (2022). Difficulties in English Speaking Encountered by Students at Universities. Piinisi Journal of Art, Humanity and Social Studies, 2(3), 11–21.

Nompo, R. S., Pragholapati, A., & Thome, A. L. (2021). Effect of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) on Anxiety: A Systematic Literature Review. The 4th International Virtual Conference on Nursing, 2021, 496–507. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v6i1.8640

Normawati, A., Nugrahaeni, D. A., Kusuma Hadi Manggolo, N. S., & Susanto, A. I. F. (2023). EFL Learners’ Difficulties in Speaking English. English Language and Education Spectrum, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.53416/electrum.v1i1.116

O’Connor, J. (2001). NLP work book (1st ed.). HarperCollins.

O’Connor, J., & Seymour, J. (1993). Introducing NLP: Psychological Skills for Understanding and Influencing People. Thorsons.

Passmore, J., & Rowson, T. (2019). Neuro-Linguistic-programming : A critical review of NLP research and the application of NLP in coaching. International Coaching Psychology Review, 14(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2019.14.1.57

Purnama, Y., Sobirov, B., Ino, L., Handayani, F., Al-Awawdeh, N., & Safitri, W. (2023). Neuro-Linguistic Programming as an Instructional Strategy to Enhance Foreign Language Teaching. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(5), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i5.6035

Rayati, M. (2021). Neuro-linguistic programming and its applicability in EFL classrooms: Perceptions of NLP-trained English teachers. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 24, 44–64. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.24.03

Revell, & Norman. (1997a). Handling NLP: A Practical Guide to Applying NLP in ELT. Saffire Press.

Revell, & Norman. (1997b). In Your Hands NLP in ELT (1st ed.). Safira press.

Rostami, N., Khodareza, M. R., & Rahimy, R. (2024). Effects of Neuro-Linguistic Programming on Language Learners ’ Self- Efficacy and Language Proficiency. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71664/jals.2024.2312-1126/

Rustan, E. (2022). Language Learning With Neurolinguistic Programming: An Integrative Review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.13

Saldana, J. (2011). Fudamental of Qualittaive Research. oxford university press.

Shulman, L. (2013). Those Who Understand : Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Journal of Education, 193, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300302

Sturt, J., Ali, S., Robertson, W., Metcalfe, D., Grove, A., & Bourne, C. (2012). Neurolinguistic programming : A Systematic Review of The effect on Health Outcomes. British Journal of General Practice, November. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X658287

Susanti, A., Rachmajanti, S., Mustofa, A., & Group, F. (2023). Between teacher ’ roles and students ’ social : Learner autonomy in online learning for EFL students during the pandemic Between teacher ’ roles and students ’ social : Learner autonomy in online learning for EFL students during the pandemic. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2204698

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

Tosey, P., & Mathinson, J. (2010). Neuro-Linguistic Programming As An Inovation In Education and Teaching. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498183

Yuliawan, T. P. (2022). NLP: The path to Excellence (1st ed.). Dinatra ASIA.

Zafa, A., Heryatun, Y., & Ibrohim, B. (2023). EFL Students’ Speaking: Problems and Solutions. International Conference on Education, 2, 1–8.

Zhang, X., Davarpanah, N., & Izadpanah, S. (2023). The effect of neurolinguistic programming on academic achievement, emotional intelligence, and critical thinking of EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888797

Downloads

0 Views
0 Downloads
Data indexed from system logs

Published

2026-07-16

How to Cite

Wattiheluw, N., Mahmud, M., & Abduh, A. (2026). Neuro-Linguistic Programming Implementation Challenges in EFL Speaking Instruction: An Ethnographic Inquiry. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development , 9(2), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v9i2.6652

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.