Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan instrumes tes High Order Thinking Skill yang ditinjau dari tingkat validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya beda. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Research and Developmemt (R&D) dengan menggunakan model Martin Tessmer yang terdiri dari beberapa tahapan yaitu tahap Preliminary, tahap Self Evaluation, tahap Prototyping (Validasi, Evaluasi, dan Revisi), dan tahap Field test. Adapun hasil pada kelompok kecil 100% soal valid, tingat reliabilitas sangat tinggi yaitu 1,03, tingkat kesukaran 80,00% sedang dan 20,00% mudah, daya beda 60,00% sangat tinggi, 25,00% rendah, dan jelek 15,00%. Sedangkan hasil pada kelompok besar 75,00% soal valid dan 25% soal tidak valid, tingkat reliabilitas tinggi yaitu 0,76, tingkat kesukaran 100% sedang, daya beda 45,00% rendah, 35,00% sedang, 15,00% sangat rendah, dan jelek 5%. Sebanyak 20 nomor soal yang dibuat dan diujicobakan, mengahasilkan 13 nomor soal yang layak untuk digunakan.
Keywords
Article Details
Authors who publish in PHYDAGOGIC agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the PHYDAGOGIC right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows anyone to compose, improve, and make derivative works non-commercially, and while they must credit you and gain no commercial advantage, they are not required to license derivative works on the same terms as the original work. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in PYDAGOGIC. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).